Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01054
Original file (PD2012 01054.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX                 CASE: PD1201054 
BRANCH OF SERVICE: NAVY                   BOARD DATE: 20130730
SEPARATION DATE: 20031017


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty Petty Officer Second Class/E-5 (HM2 / Hospital Corpsman [Orthopedic Technician]) medically separated for degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine greatest at L4-L5 and L5-SI. The CI began having back pain in August 2000 after a lifting injury. She received no relief with various types of conservative treatment measures. Her back pain worsened and became constant and was refractory to treatment. Imaging disclosed degenerative changes in the thoracic and lumbar spine. The CI also had a long history of Grave’s Disease controlled on medication beginning in about 1991. The lumbar spine condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her rating or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was placed on duty restrictions and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB identified and forwarded five conditions (see the rating comparison chart below) for PEB adjudication IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The PEB adjudicated DDD of the lumbar spine greatest at L4-L5 and L5-SI as unfitting, rated 0%. Three of t he remaining conditions were determined to be c ategory II: c onditions that contribute to the unfitting condition and one was determined to be c ategory III : c onditions that are not separately unfitting and do not contribute to the unfitting condition(s). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “I was informed that I am eligible for a review.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The service rating for the unfitting lumbar spine condition, and its contributing category II conditions, are addressed below; no additional conditions are within the Board’s defined DoDI 6040.44 purview. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.















RATING COMPARISON:

Service IPEB – Dated 20030721
 VA - (~ 10 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD), Lumbar Spine Greatest at L4-L5 & L5-SI
 5295 0% Thoracolumbar Degenerative Disc Disease 5243-5243 10% STR & 20040823
B/L L5 Spondylo l ysis w/o Spondylolisthesis
 Category II
Multi-Level DDD w/Facet Syndrome, Thoracic & Lumbar Spine
 Category II
DDD, T9 to T-12
 Category III
Graves ’ Disease S/P Radioactive Iodine Ablation, Stable On Synthroid
Category II Hypothyroidism Secondary To Radioiodine Ablation
Therapy For Graves' Disease		 7903 10% STR &
20040823
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 11 20040823
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 40%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 41005, which included all deferred issues adjudicated effective to date of separation ( DOS ). CI was a no show to her originally scheduled C&P exam for 20040318, so the initial rating in VARD dated 20040614 was based on the STR, but did not change after the C&P exam of 20040823.


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Disability Evaluation System (DES) has neither the role nor the authority to compensate service members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. This role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans’ Affairs. The Board’s authority as defined in DoDI 6044.40 resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness determinations and rating decisions for disability at the time of separation.

Lumbar Spine Condition. The CI had a long history of back pain that became worse in August 2000. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed multi-level DDD of lower thoracic and lower lumbar and sacral segments. Central disc bulging was present at L4-5 and L5-S1. The narrative summary (NARSUM) performed 7 months prior to separation noted no improvement in low thoracic and lumbar back pain with medications or multi-modality physical therapy (PT). The pain was described as constant and worse with activity. Examination revealed normal gait, posture and spinal curves. Tenderness was present but muscle spasm was absent. One exam maneuver resulted in exacerbation of back pain and left leg radicular symptoms, but a straight leg raise test (SLR) was negative for radicular symptoms. Lower extremity muscle strength, sensation and reflexes were normal. A PT evaluation on 15 April 2003 (6 months prior to separation) noted active range-of-motion (ROM) within normal limits except for extension which was reduced by 50%. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam, performed 10 months after separation, posture and gait were normal. There was no lumbar tenderness and no muscle spasm. SLR was negative bilaterally. There was no additional limitation of motion with repetitive motion. ROM revealed flexion of 90 degrees (normal to 90 degrees), extension of 10 degrees (normal 30 degrees), right rotation of 30 degrees (normal 30 degrees), left rotation of 40 degrees and lateral flexion of 30 degrees bilaterally (normal 30 degrees). Combined ROM was 220 degrees. Painful motion was present during extension and right rotation. Lower extremity muscle strength, reflexes and sensation were normal.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. It is noted in this case that the PEB's adjudication was IAW VASRD §4.71a criteria in effect at the time of those proceedings but a change to the current §4.71a criteria (General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine) was effected 26 September 2003, in advance of the date of separation. The Board must apply the latter criteria to its recommendation IAW DoDI 6040.44. The PEB used the 5295 code (lumbosacral strain) in assigning a 0% rating (“slight subjective symptoms only”). The VA assigned a 10% rating under the newer 5243 code (intervertebral disc syndrome) based on evidence of painful motion. Board members considered that the limitation of extension as described by the service physical therapist probably resulted in a combined ROM that justified a 10% rating, but concluded that the detailed ROM by the VA examiner clearly met this threshold. There was likewise agreement that a 10% rating was supported by evidence of painful motion (VASRD §4.59) and by the presence of tenderness. There was no evidence of abnormal gait or spinal contour necessary to justify the next higher 20% rating. The Board also considered rating intervertebral disc disease under the alternative formula for incapacitating episodes, but could not find sufficient evidence which would warrant a higher rating under that formula. Board members finally concluded that L5 spondylolysis without spondylolisthesis and multi-level DDD with facet syndrome of the thoracic and lumbar spine were properly subsumed as contributing category II conditions. However, the Board also agreed that, having just appropriately deemed DDD of thoracic and lumbar spine as category II, it was then inconsistent to declare “DDD of the lower thoracic spine from T9 to T12” as category III. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the lumbar DDD condition, coded 5243.

Other PEB Conditions. Although there was evidence in PEB deliberation documents that Grave’s disease was considered a category III condition (not separately unfitting and not contributing to the unfitting spine condition), the final PEB document listed the disease as category II. This might have represented an administrative error. The Board agreed that since Grave’s disease bore no relationship to the unfitting spine condition, a category III designation was more appropriate. The Board’s main charge is to assess the fairness of the PEB’s determination that Grave’s disease was not separately unfitting. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. The Grave’s disease condition did not carry an attached limited duty and was not implicated in the commander’s statement. It was reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board. There was no performance based evidence from the record that this condition significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. The Board concluded therefore that the Grave’s disease condition could not be recommended for additional disability rating.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5243 IAW VASRD §4.71a. In the matter of the category II Grave’s disease condition, the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend it for additional disability rating.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Degenerative Disc Disease of the Lumbar Spine
 5243 10%
COMBINED
 10%



The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120703, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





                          
                 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                  President
                  Physical Disability Board of Review

MEMORANDUM FOR DEPUTY COMMANDANT, MANPOWER & RESERVE AFFAIRS
                  COMMANDER, NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
                                         
Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(c) PDBR ltr dtd 16 Oct 13 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(d) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

1. Pursuant to reference (a) I approve the recommendations of the Physical Disability Board of Review set forth in references (b) through (d).

2. The official records of the following individuals are to be corrected to reflect the stated disposition:

         a. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

         b. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , former USN, XXX XX XXXX : Disability separation with a final disability rating of 10% (increased from 0%) effective 17 October 2003.
c. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
        
3. Please ensure all necessary actions are taken, included the recoupment of disability severance pay if warranted, to implement these decisions and that subject members are notified once those actions are completed.


          XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
         Assistant General Counsel
         (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01840

    Original file (PD-2013-01840.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the low back pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01985

    Original file (PD-2014-01985.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the VASRD rules for rating the spine in effect at the time of separation thoracic and lumbar spine conditions coded IAW §4.71a are provided a single disability rating and thus the thoracic DDD and the lumbago (listed by the PEB as separate conditions) are subsumed in the §4.71a rating that follows. Since the disability due only to the left foot cannot be isolated by the clinical evidence or from the fitness implications of the bilateral condition, the Board consensus was that...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00686

    Original file (PD 2012 00686.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chronic Low Back Pain due to Degenerative Disc Disease and Bertotolli’s Syndrome Condition. The remote from separation, VA exam in November 2006, documented slight pain-limited ROM and the VA continued their 10% rating based on that exam. The exams were about the same time prior to and after separation.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00648

    Original file (PD2012-00648.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    L3/4 and L4/5 Disc Herniation Status Post Laminectomy (Low Back Pain) Condition [Including Associated Lower Back Conditions]. Post-Sep 80⁰ 30⁰ - - 30⁰ 30⁰ - “Mild motion”; + spasm; X-ray: reversal of the the lumbar spine 20% curvature of limitation of At the MEB examination, dictated 5 months prior to separation, the CI reported pain in his back radiating to his buttocks and hamstrings, without weakness. 3 PD1200648 RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00604

    Original file (PD2011-00604.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was then medically separated with that disability rating. The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01560

    Original file (PD-2012-01560.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was then medically separated with a disability rating of 0%. The PEB rated it 0%, and the VA assigned a disability rating of 20%. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01977

    Original file (PD-2014-01977.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated “chronic neck pain” and “chronic low back pain” as unfitting, rated 10% and 0%, respectively, for a combined 10% disability, with likely reliance on AR 635-40 for rating. Disk protrusions were noted to decrease from 2005 through 2007 and the mild dilatation of the central thoracolumbar spinal canal (Syrinx) was stable.At the MEB exam, the CI reported back pain exacerbated by activity and rare left leg pain. In the matter of the back condition, the Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00484

    Original file (PD2011-00484.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board agreed there was no additional rating to consider for the thoracic scoliosis as this was subsumed in the general rating formula for diseases and injuries of the spine and IAW VASRD §4.14 the evaluation of the same disability under various diagnoses is to be avoided. All evidence considered, there is not reasonable doubt in the CI’s favor supporting a change from the PEB’s rating decision for the thoracolumbar spine condition. The Board therefore has no reasonable basis for...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00270

    Original file (PD-2014-00270.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20060601 The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board directed attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB rated the low back condition 10%, coded 5243 (intervertebral disc syndrome) and the VA rated it...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00618

    Original file (PD2013 00618.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD1300618BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army BOARD DATE: 20140410 At the narrative summary (NARSUM) performed on 13 November 2006, 3 months prior to separation, the CI endorsed “chronic mid and low back pain.” Her physical examination revealed tenderness along her low back, positive left straight leg raise, subjective numbness in all left toes and two positive Waddell signs (pain indicator tests). BOARD FINDINGS :...